[Ardour-Users] Qcon control surface support

[Paul Davis]

nobody is working on this at present. the work involved is complex and i
would not recommend it as a learning project.


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Yoann Lubiato <contact at lymixstudio.com>wrote:

> Ok, thanks for the enlightment Paul.
> Are some people working on this or would you need help?
> As I said, i'm not a coder, but i've been turning around for a while,
> and this would be a good  occasion so start learning, if u think this
> is reasonnable, for someone who's not into this, but who learns quite
> fast.
> If you have some ressources to share as a start, i would be glad to
> give a try
> Thanks
> I guess the job done would serve other Mackie-like devices
>
> I can share the dedicated function key map too if you want it
> implemented in Ardour3.x
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2013 09:04:04 -0400 Paul Davis
> <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
>
> > if it sent OSC, all (most) those things could be controlled. but for
> > MIDI right now, we're "stuck" with the model created by
> >
> >    (a) dynamic, user-driven binding between MIDI messages and
> > controllable things
> > and
> >    (b) the model defined by Mackie Control
> >
> > and yes, changing this involves coding.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Yoann Lubiato
> > <contact at lymixstudio.com>wrote:
> >
> > > Hi, i'm really happy with the Qcon, even if it's not as fonctionnal
> > > on linux that it can be on Nuendo/PT, ...
> > > I mean, i cannot control  aux sends, insert parameters, and track
> > > automation modes.
> > > Anyway, it's really a good device, the faders are good,and touch
> > > sensitive, the big leds make it really easy to use almost "blindly",
> > > and the level  meters are really useful too.
> > > The jog looks a little cheap, but i had no problem with it and is
> > > precise
> > > I'm trying to find how to control the missing parameters quoted
> > > above, but it seems to be hard coding, and i'm not a coder
> > >
> > > On 08/26/2013 08:15 PM, Yoann Lubiato wrote:
> > > > > Hi, i'm working on a function key map for the iCon qCon control
> > > > > surface ,and i'd like to get some suggestions from other users
> > > > > about the functions they expect to have first on the device
> > > > > Here's my proposal so far :
> > > > >
> > > > > window management : Mixer/Meterbridge/Audio connections/ Midi
> > > > > connections - Save/restore views
> > > > >
> > > > > Transport : go to previous(next) marker / go to start (end) /
> > > > > punch in (out) / auto return / loop selected region / click
> > > > > on / tap tempo /insert(show) markers
> > > > >
> > > > > Monitor : dim /exclusive solo
> > > > >
> > > > > Edit : split /export / nudge / align / snapmode
> > > > >
> > > > > Tool selct  : smart(zoom) / object(draw) / Range (listen)
> > > > >
> > > > > () means shift option
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > All suggestions welcome, thanks!
> > > >
> > > > wow, great news. i briefly looked at the qcon when it was first
> > > > announced, but i backed away from it for lack of decent
> > > > information re linux compatibility. now i look at it again, i
> > > > find it's a class compliant usb midi device. very nice.
> > > >
> > > > what is your impression of the mechanical quality and reliability?
> > > > and do the faders have touch sensors?
> > > > are you using it on linux or mac?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Ardour-Users mailing list
> > > ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> > > http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
> > >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20130829/40a4a672/attachment-0001.htm>