[Ardour-Users] Restarting Ardour 4.2.1 under Leopard (josue moreno)

Sun Jun 8 15:09:04 PDT 2008

Can you post a console log?

ardour-users-request at lists.ardour.org wrote:
> Send Ardour-Users mailing list submissions to
> 	ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	ardour-users-request at lists.ardour.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	ardour-users-owner at lists.ardour.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Ardour-Users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Restarting Ardour 4.2.1 under Leopard (josue moreno)
>    2. Re: Anyone using a HDSP9632 at 96K ? (John Rigg)
>    3. Off topic PS:  Anyone using a HDSP9632 at 96K ? (Ralf Mardorf)
>    4. Re: Off topic PS:  Anyone using a HDSP9632 at 96K ?
>       (Mark Greenwood)
>    5. Re: Off topic PS:  Anyone using a HDSP9632 at 96K ? (John Rigg)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 20:46:15 +0000
> From: josue moreno <josuemoreno1 at hotmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] Restarting Ardour 4.2.1 under Leopard
> To: <ardour-users at lists.ardour.org>
> Message-ID: <BAY143-W50E027EFD07DEB71FA8A6C8CB60 at phx.gbl>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
>
>
>
>   
>> Did you get the version off the #ardour-osx channel?
>>
>>
>>     
>
> Yes I did, the earlier version I downloaded from the same place and it was working nice, but this new release have this problems. Even sometimes the AudioSetup menu at the beginning some times dissapear
>
> But the main problem is that after a crash then it says that Ardour cannot connect with JACK
>
> Thanks
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tecnolog?a, moda, motor, viajes,?suscr?bete a nuestros boletines para estar siempre a la ?ltima
> http://newsletters.msn.com/hm/maintenanceeses.asp?L=ES&C=ES&P=WCMaintenance&Brand=WL&RU=http%3a%2f%2fmail.live.com
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 19:44:57 +0100
> From: John Rigg <au at sound-man.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] Anyone using a HDSP9632 at 96K ?
> To: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> Message-ID: <20080608184457.GA2693 at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sat, Jun 07, 2008 at 09:24:48PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>   
>>> Strangely enough though - both utilities seem to be perfectly happy to
>>> switch automatically between 48K and 44.1K.  In other words, if I set up
>>> Ardour for 48K or 44.1K I don't need to faff around with anything else.
>>> So what stops them from switching automatically to 96K?
>>>       
>> Just a thought:
>>
>> 44,1 we can hear the less quality, but it's CD standard
>>
>> 48 we only be able to miss analogue tape compression etc., but the sound
>> seems to be like the original and it's DAT standard
>>
>> 96 might be the best quality for many sound chips, but it might be
>> needles, because it's to good in most cases
>>     
>
> There are a couple of reasons why 96kHz can sound better.
>
> Most audio ADC chips use an incorrectly implemented decimation
> filter to convert the single bit oversampled data from
> the sampling stage to multibit PCM. If you check any of the
> common ADC data sheets you'll see a stopband spec for the
> filter of about 0.55 x sample rate, a clear violation of
> sampling theory. This allows a small amount of aliasing to occur
> on high frequency signals, and increasing the sample rate shifts
> the problem to a higher, less audible frequency range. Correctly
> designed converters like those from Lavry or Prism don't suffer
> from this, but are very expensive.
>
> The other reason is that non-linear DSP like compression
> or limiting introduces harmonics, which will also produce aliasing
> of high frequency signals. A higher sample rate reduces (but doesn't
> entirely eliminate) the aliasing.
>
> In practice, these effects are often not noticeable enough to
> put up with the disadvantages of doubling the data rate, but YMMV.
>
> John
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 21:55:52 +0200
> From: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>
> Subject: [Ardour-Users] Off topic PS:  Anyone using a HDSP9632 at 96K
> 	?
> To: John Rigg <au at sound-man.co.uk>, ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> Message-ID: <484C3948.8030305 at alice-dsl.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15"
>
> Oops ;)
>
> I'm from Germany, sometimes I write "here" when I want to say "hear",
> sorry for that.
>
> Can someone translate "diskret aufgebaut"? That means circuitry without
> chips.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: signature.asc
> Type: application/pgp-signature
> Size: 252 bytes
> Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
> URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/private.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20080608/b6bfd304/attachment-0001.pgp>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:16:10 +0100
> From: Mark Greenwood <fatgerman at ntlworld.com>
> Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] Off topic PS:  Anyone using a HDSP9632 at
> 	96K ?
> To: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> Message-ID: <200806082116.10461.fatgerman at ntlworld.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="utf-8"
>
> I'm not a German speaker, but I think it's probably 'discrete components'. That's what I'd call 'circuitry without chips'. Mind you, I'm from England, so chips normally implies fish.. :)
>
> Mark
>
> On Sunday 08 June 2008 20:55:52 Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>   
>> Oops ;)
>>
>> I'm from Germany, sometimes I write "here" when I want to say "hear",
>> sorry for that.
>>
>> Can someone translate "diskret aufgebaut"? That means circuitry without
>> chips.
>>
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 21:32:13 +0100
> From: John Rigg <au at sound-man.co.uk>
> Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] Off topic PS:  Anyone using a HDSP9632 at
> 	96K ?
> To: Ralf Mardorf <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net>
> Cc: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> Message-ID: <20080608203213.GA2994 at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Sun, Jun 08, 2008 at 09:55:52PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>   
>> Can someone translate "diskret aufgebaut"? That means circuitry without
>> chips.
>>     
>
> Discrete circuitry  :-)
>
> John
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>
>
> End of Ardour-Users Digest, Vol 53, Issue 10
> ********************************************
>
>   