[ardour-users] bugs / feature requests
Peter Lutek
plutek at infinity.net
Wed Oct 26 07:35:58 PDT 2005
Mark Knecht wrote:
>On 10/26/05, Peter Lutek <plutek at infinity.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Paul Symons wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>A nice wishlist feature could be the ability to mark plugins as
>>>"favourites". of the hundreds of LADSPA plugins i have, i typically use
>>>about 5-10 of them on a regular basis, e.g. my favourite compressor, eq,
>>>reverb, delay, lo-fi, etc.
>>>
>>>It would be great to mark these plugins as "favourites" and then be able
>>>to add them straight to the pre or post mixer strips from some sort of
>>>"favourites" context menu, saving the requirement to open the plugin
>>>manager.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>i'm not sure that a "favourites" context menu would be all that much
>>more efficient than just going to the plugin manager. as paul davis
>>suggested earlier in this thread, why not just set up a template
>>session, with your favourite plugins already patched. have them all
>>bypassed in the template, then you can just enable them with a single
>>click as needed.
>>
>>-p
>>
>>
>
>Better in my option would be a 'recent' plugins menu item that saves
>the last 5-10 plugins I've used. I don't like any plugin in a session
>that isn't being used for CPU cycles reasons and just the basic
>principle.
>
>I really disagree withthe original post that something should be in
>Ardour just because it it's been seen in a hardware mixer:
>
>1) Everything on the screen takes up real estate
>
>2) Everything in the session uses memory and CPU cycles
>
>3) I do not use EQ on 95% of my tracks.
>
>Just my 2 cents,
>Mark
>
>
>
i am also a minimal plugin user, and am normally plugin-free on most
tracks, so i would not tend to use the sort of template i described, but
i suggested it on the assumption that a bypassed plugin does NOT
substantially load the session. i suppose you're right that it must be
held in memory, at least, since it can be enabled during playback, but
surely it doesn't eat cpu cycles when bypassed.
perhaps paul would care to address the issue of memory/cpu usage by
bypassed plugins.
-p
More information about the Ardour-Users
mailing list