[ardour-users] RE: FW: OSX Build

Sun Jun 12 07:12:25 PDT 2005

I'm using Ardour OSX quite successfully with quite a few LADSAP plugins 
for mobile recording on my Powerbook, though I built the version 
myself.  There is a nice version of beta .29 that may work for you that 
was compiled by Taybin a while back, thought there were some problems 
with it.

I have link to binaries and instructions for building here:
http://tinysongs.com/linux.html

*Matthew Polashek*
Home e-mail: matt at tinysongs.com
URL: www.tinysongs.com

Get Firefox! <http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=67>

ardour-users-ardour.org-request at lists.ardour.org wrote:

>Send ardour-users-ardour.org mailing list submissions to
>	ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>
>To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>	http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>	ardour-users-ardour.org-request at lists.ardour.org
>
>You can reach the person managing the list at
>	ardour-users-ardour.org-owner at lists.ardour.org
>
>When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
>than "Re: Contents of ardour-users-ardour.org digest..."
>
>
>Today's Topics:
>
>   1. Re: AMD motherboard recommendations please? (Eric)
>   2. Re: shall we wait for VST or go with libfst? (Geoff Beasley)
>   3. VST plug that saves and automates in Ardour (Geoff Beasley)
>   4. Re: VST plug that saves and automates in Ardour (Geoff Beasley)
>   5. Re: VST plug that saves and automates in Ardour (Geoff Beasley)
>   6. Re: VST plug that saves and automates in Ardour (Paul Davis)
>   7. Re: VST plug that saves and automates in Ardour (Geoff Beasley)
>   8. Re: shall we wait for VST or go with libfst? (Frank smith)
>   9. Cleaning the folders (Frank smith)
>  10. Re: Cleaning the folders (Paul Davis)
>  11. Re: shall we wait for VST or go with libfst? (Geoff Beasley)
>  12. FW: OSX Build (Mat Wall-Smith)
>
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>Message: 1
>Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 14:41:07 -0500
>From: Eric <ej at ir.iit.edu>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] AMD motherboard recommendations please?
>To: ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>Cc: linux-audio-user at music.columbia.edu
>Message-ID: <20050611194107.GA17233 at duvel.ir.iit.edu>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
>I'm using an AMD K7D Master with two Athlon 2400's.  It's OK, but
>occasionally locks up hard...I think that's been reduced by realizing
>the ECC feature of my RAM was turned off in the BIOS.  Even so, it
>seems to me (only anecdotal evidence to back this) that SMP actually
>hurts latency due to the extra scheduling, etc. problems introduced.
>I still haven't figured out how to configure my system to do any
>better than "-n 3 -p 256" for jackd.  I suspect many of my problems
>are the 64-bit PCI SCSI controller I have running my disks, especially
>since in the AMD MP architecture it has to sit above the other, 32-bit
>PCI bus where my M-Audio Delta 66 soundcard fits.  I'm crossing my
>fingers that 2.6.12 with Mingo's realtime-preempt patches will solve
>my problems...right now I'm running an unpatched 2.6.9 kernel since my
>last attempt at rebuilding to incorporate both my ATI Radeon 9800
>drivers and low-latency resulted in me losing a large chunk of my XFS
>filesystem through a series of hard crashes.
>
>In any case, should you opt for the AMD MP, i have nice quiet cooling
>in my LITEON FS020 case with an Antec TRUE480 power supply, two Pabst
>120mm fans, Thermalright SLK-900A heat sinks, and Zalman ZM-F2 92mm
>fans on my CPU's.  This is entirely ruined by my whining FUJITSU
>MAN3367MP and QUANTUM ATLAS10K2 10,000 RPM hard drives, and possibly
>by the little fan on my Radeon video card.
>
>good luck,
>eric.
>
>On Sat, Jun 11, 2005 at 09:44:18AM -0700, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
>  
>
>>I'm building a system and would like to have it be dual AMD.  What 
>>motherboards are you using, which are still current enough to buy one 
>>new?  It'd be good if the motherboard layout was such that I can fit 
>>a quiet CPU cooler, Zalman or such, on each CPU.  Thanks....
>>
>>
>>--
>>Kevin
>>    
>>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 2
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:05:34 +1000
>From: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] shall we wait for VST or go with libfst?
>To: Wolfgang Woehl <tito at rumford.de>
>Cc: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118527534.4551.7.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>On Fri, 2005-06-10 at 17:35 +0200, Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
>
>  
>
>>How did you measure that exactly? I'd be very interested in solid info 
>>here. Thanks in advance.
>>    
>>
>
>Not scientifically I'm afraid Wolfgang. I simply ran the 8ch under Linux
>and compared that to my XP install of the time. BIG difference. I don't
>have an XP box anymore (never mind) so can't be more scientific, but the
>effect was a real one; the actual numbers just a guess, but they'd be
>pretty close...say -83 V -85dB approx or thereabouts I'd say. 
>
>Thinking about it, I have an XP games box at home here, and I have my
>DAW at home today also...hhhmmm, might just install and do an A-B..good
>idea.
>
>I'll let you know.
>
>Best,
>Geoff.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 3
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:23:41 +1000
>From: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Subject: [ardour-users] VST plug that saves and automates in Ardour
>To: Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com>
>Cc: ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118528621.4551.10.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>I have found that the Genecomp range from http://www.x-
>buz.com/products.html save and automate in Ardour. It does work for some
>plugs anyway. Try them; a lot are free and work very nicely.Let's start
>that list !
>
>Cheers,
>Geoff.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 4
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:44:29 +1000
>From: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] VST plug that saves and automates in
>	Ardour
>To: Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com>
>Cc: ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118529869.4551.13.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>Add North Pole, Paris Eq, FloorFish...
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 5
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 08:59:47 +1000
>From: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] VST plug that saves and automates in
>	Ardour
>To: Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com>
>Cc: ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118530787.4551.19.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>Ambience Reverb also saves using automation. As you rightly pointed out
>Mark, they dont save from their own interface...but automation is a fine
>compromise to me anyway.It seems that if the plug runs normally and
>reports it's controls to jack_fst then you can automate and save. That's
>how it's panned out so far for me anyway.
>
>So many plugs..such little time
>
>Cheers,
>
>Geoff
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 19:01:23 -0400
>From: Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] VST plug that saves and automates in
>	Ardour
>To: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Cc: ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118530883.14183.1.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 08:59 +1000, Geoff Beasley wrote:
>  
>
>>Ambience Reverb also saves using automation. As you rightly pointed out
>>Mark, they dont save from their own interface...but automation is a fine
>>compromise to me anyway.It seems that if the plug runs normally and
>>reports it's controls to jack_fst then you can automate and save. That's
>>how it's panned out so far for me anyway.
>>    
>>
>
>automation is never saved via a plugin on any platform, its always host
>side. AFAIK, VST plugins can save state just like LADSPA, unless they
>are flagged as wanting to use "chunks", which are a way of the plugin
>saving its own settings in an opaque way. IIRC, Ambience is one such
>plugin. I have not written code to support this, although its not really
>hard to do.
>
>--p
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 7
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 09:20:23 +1000
>From: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] VST plug that saves and automates in
>	Ardour
>To: paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
>Cc: ardour-users-ardour.org at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118532023.4551.27.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>  
>
>>at, 2005-06-11 at 19:01 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
>>plugin. I have not written code to support this, although its not really
>>hard to do.
>>
>>--p
>>    
>>
> Would make a lot of people happy if you could ! 
>
>Hey Mark ..BTW: a very nice free EQ which does save it's current state
>in Ardour without automation is  LinearPhaseGraphicEQ 2
>available from
>http://www.ismusic.ne.jp/slim_slow_slider/vst/
>
>just page down to it. Haven't tried the other stuff there yet.Most
>important is to be sure you install msvcr71.dll into your wine (windows)
>system folder. If you haven't got that .dll others won't work either.
>
>
>Geoff.
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 8
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:41:17 +0100
>From: Frank smith <fsmith at walescomputers.co.uk>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] shall we wait for VST or go with libfst?
>To: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Cc: ardour <ardour-users at lists.ardour.org>
>Message-ID: <1118536877.4172.1.camel at bear.rokpa>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>I to have an Xp box and Fervent software on Linux.
>I will run some 16 track tests with Ardour and cakewalk
>just to see how they react.
>Not very scifi I know.
>
>Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 08:05 +1000, Geoff Beasley wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Thinking about it, I have an XP games box at home here, and I have my
>>DAW at home today also...hhhmmm, might just install and do an A-B..good
>>idea.
>>
>>I'll let you know.
>>
>>Best,
>>Geoff.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>ardour-users-ardour.org mailing list
>>ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
>>http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 9
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 01:48:48 +0100
>From: Frank smith <fsmith at walescomputers.co.uk>
>Subject: [ardour-users] Cleaning the folders
>To: ardour <ardour-users at lists.ardour.org>
>Message-ID: <1118537328.4172.6.camel at bear.rokpa>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>HI
>I have just started using ardour for my 16 track studio.
>I seem to have lost some work when I cleaned out some stuff
>when the project got a bit big.
>
>I now assume that you can't use the clean folders from within a project.
>When I restarted Ardour I couldn't load the last saved files.
>
>Is this a known thing?
>
>I'm not on the latest release yet.
>
>Cheers
>Bob
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 10
>Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:55:02 -0400
>From: Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] Cleaning the folders
>To: Frank smith <fsmith at walescomputers.co.uk>
>Cc: ardour <ardour-users at lists.ardour.org>
>Message-ID: <1118537702.14183.3.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>what version are you using? 
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 11
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 11:16:41 +1000
>From: Geoff Beasley <songshop at bizmedia.com.au>
>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] shall we wait for VST or go with libfst?
>To: Wolfgang Woehl <tito at rumford.de>
>Cc: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
>Message-ID: <1118539001.4571.1.camel at localhost.localdomain>
>Content-Type: text/plain
>
>On Sun, 2005-06-12 at 08:05 +1000, Geoff Beasley wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Thinking about it, I have an XP games box at home here, and I have my
>>DAW at home today also...hhhmmm, might just install and do an A-B..good
>>idea.
>>    
>>
>Wrong; I don't have a break out box here.. they're in the studio. I'll
>have to test there. Maybe I'll take the gamebox into the studio.......
>
>Cheers,
>
>Geoff.
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>Message: 12
>Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2005 18:30:20 +1000
>From: Mat Wall-Smith <mat at slashstarhash.com>
>Subject: [ardour-users] FW: OSX Build
>To: ardour <ardour-users at lists.ardour.org>
>Message-ID: <BED22FBC.10DE%mat at slashstarhash.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>Checking through the archive shows a build for OSX was posted late April.
>Was wondering if anyone is using Ardour in OSX successfully in a pro-audio
>environment and whether an OSX build (even a beta) is available (or will be
>soon)?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Mat Wall-Smith
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>ardour-users-ardour.org mailing list
>ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
>http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>
>
>End of ardour-users-ardour.org Digest, Vol 17, Issue 20
>*******************************************************
>
>
>  
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20050612/449923c9/attachment-0002.htm>