[ardour-users] Potential user Ardour questions
Josh Karnes
jkarnes1 at austin.rr.com
Sat Mar 20 09:48:17 PST 2004
Jesse Chappell wrote:
> Everyone is always focused on low latency, when it really isn't
> what everyone needs.... ignore me if you have good reasons for
> wanting it. This was just a public service announcement :)
Well, the need for low latency for me is just in case there is no near-zero
latency way of monitoring incoming tracks. Remember, I'm trying to do this
WITHOUT a hardware mixer. So, if with the Delta 1010 I can make use of the
1010's built in "direct monitoring" feature, and Ardour supports latency
compensation (which I believe it does), then it's not an issue.
The VST thing is the kicker for me, I think, since I am highly addicted to a
Windows-VST compressor plugin. However, this plugin is said to work with the
wine & vstserver implementation.
--
Josh Karnes
http://www.krashjones.com
http://www.prophetsandpoets.com
More information about the Ardour-Users
mailing list