[Ardour-Dev] Ardour and jackdbus
rosea.grammostola at gmail.com
Sun Dec 27 02:28:43 PST 2009
rosea grammostola wrote:
> Then new Linux audio session handler Ladish, requires, whether you
> like it or not, jackdbus (at least till version 1.0) to run. It is
> likely that Ladish is useful for people and that they start to use it.
> I did some testing with it and it seems that having jackd and jackdbus
> (both from same jack2 source) installed on one system is not the ideal
> So people who want to use Ladish may end up with only jackdbus installed.
> Now I'm doing a bit of research how to deal with this situation best
> and how to prepare for it, personal and as 'Linux audio world'.
> Now my question is. What implications does this have for the use of
> Ardour. Are there disadvantages to use jackdbus with Ardour instead of
> jackd? If they exist, is there a way to make this disadvantage as
> small as possible?
> Thanks in advance,
Someone please? Thanks.
More information about the Ardour-Dev