[ardour-dev] 2.0.2 issues...

[Lawrence T. Levine]

Cop out. :)

Best Regards,

Lawrence T. Levine
Direct: +1-434-531-5982

On Sat, 12 May 2007, Quentin Harley wrote:

> Lawrence T. Levine wrote:
>> :)  Good to know what the problem isn't.  Any thoughts on what the problem 
>> is?
>> 
>> Best Regards,
>> 
>> Lawrence T. Levine
>> Direct: +1-434-531-5982
>> 
>
> There is an easy way...
>
> Get an audio distribution like 64Studio http://64studio.com and everything 
> will be working pretty much "out of the box" with all the latest versions of 
> pretty much everything at the moment (1.6.6 testing release)
>
> It beats the hell out of the normal dependency hell!
>
> Cheers, Quentin
>
>> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Paul Davis wrote:
>>
>> 
>>> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 11:30 +0200, Harold Aling wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Lawrence T. Levine wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Ok... this is probably me or hopefully easy but I've been banging my 
>>>>> head
>>>>> against the wall and now I'm stuck.... :(
>>>>> 
>>>>> I made the classic mistake of changing two things.
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1) I upgraded Jack from .101 to .103. It seemed to go fine but I have to
>>>>> admit I haven't run anything before the next steps but I have reason to
>>>>> believe it's part of my problem.
>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>> Did you recompile all applications depending on jack?
>>>> 
>>> this is almost never necessary. JACK has had a backwardly-compatible
>>> stable ABI from the perspective of applications for some time.
>>> 
>>> qjackctl crashing might be related to the upgrade, and it might be
>>> necessary to recompile *it*, but you do not have to recompile JACK
>>> clients when JACK is upgraded except under specific circumstances that
>>> we will make clear when we do a release.
>>> 
>>> --p
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> ardour-dev mailing list
>> ardour-dev at lists.ardour.org
>> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org
>>
>> 
>
>
>
>