[ardour-dev] 2.0.2 issues...

[Quentin Harley]

Lawrence T. Levine wrote:
> :)  Good to know what the problem isn't.  Any thoughts on what the problem 
> is?
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Lawrence T. Levine
> Direct: +1-434-531-5982
>   

There is an easy way...

Get an audio distribution like 64Studio http://64studio.com and 
everything will be working pretty much "out of the box" with all the 
latest versions of pretty much everything at the moment (1.6.6 testing 
release)

It beats the hell out of the normal dependency hell!

Cheers, Quentin

> On Fri, 11 May 2007, Paul Davis wrote:
>
>   
>> On Fri, 2007-05-11 at 11:30 +0200, Harold Aling wrote:
>>     
>>> Lawrence T. Levine wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Ok... this is probably me or hopefully easy but I've been banging my head
>>>> against the wall and now I'm stuck.... :(
>>>>
>>>> I made the classic mistake of changing two things.
>>>>
>>>> 1) I upgraded Jack from .101 to .103. It seemed to go fine but I have to
>>>> admit I haven't run anything before the next steps but I have reason to
>>>> believe it's part of my problem.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> Did you recompile all applications depending on jack?
>>>       
>> this is almost never necessary. JACK has had a backwardly-compatible
>> stable ABI from the perspective of applications for some time.
>>
>> qjackctl crashing might be related to the upgrade, and it might be
>> necessary to recompile *it*, but you do not have to recompile JACK
>> clients when JACK is upgraded except under specific circumstances that
>> we will make clear when we do a release.
>>
>> --p
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> ardour-dev mailing list
> ardour-dev at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-dev-ardour.org
>
>