[Ardour-Users] Faderport: more options ?

[Paul Davis]

ardour-dev or IRC is better.

On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 10:42 PM, jonetsu <jonetsu at teksavvy.com> wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:13:37 -0500
> Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
>
> > We're not likely to do any work on such features in the foreseeable
> > future.
> >
> > The code is all there, if somebody else wants to play with it to do
> > this.
> >
> > I implemented the faderport support with the intention to honor
> > Presonus' design of the device. You can make an argument that every
> > button should just be "a button", and every other control device on
> > it should be "a device", and the user should just be able to map them
> > all, and do whatever they want.
> >
> > That's what open source is for.
>
> All right.  I might take up the "challenge".  It would be a nice way to
> get back into coding.  Is this mailing list here the right place to ask
> about coding aspects ?
>
> Cheers.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20180109/69d5992d/attachment.htm>