[Ardour-Users] Faderport: more options ?

jonetsu jonetsu at teksavvy.com
Tue Jan 9 19:42:27 PST 2018

On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:13:37 -0500
Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:

> We're not likely to do any work on such features in the foreseeable
> future.
> The code is all there, if somebody else wants to play with it to do
> this.
> I implemented the faderport support with the intention to honor
> Presonus' design of the device. You can make an argument that every
> button should just be "a button", and every other control device on
> it should be "a device", and the user should just be able to map them
> all, and do whatever they want.
> That's what open source is for.

All right.  I might take up the "challenge".  It would be a nice way to
get back into coding.  Is this mailing list here the right place to ask
about coding aspects ?


More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list