[Ardour-Users] Faderport: more options ?
jonetsu at teksavvy.com
Tue Jan 9 19:42:27 PST 2018
On Tue, 9 Jan 2018 22:13:37 -0500
Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> We're not likely to do any work on such features in the foreseeable
> The code is all there, if somebody else wants to play with it to do
> I implemented the faderport support with the intention to honor
> Presonus' design of the device. You can make an argument that every
> button should just be "a button", and every other control device on
> it should be "a device", and the user should just be able to map them
> all, and do whatever they want.
> That's what open source is for.
All right. I might take up the "challenge". It would be a nice way to
get back into coding. Is this mailing list here the right place to ask
about coding aspects ?
More information about the Ardour-Users