[Ardour-Users] Good plugins, Re: Hm...

[Arnold Krille]

On Wednesday 01 September 2010 14:27:22 Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> PS I wouldn't use Jamin as a replacement for a channel
> compressor(Which often can be single band and MUCH cheaper on
> resources than Jamin is).  It can be a replacement for many things,
> but the compressors you name I wouldn't use for a mastering compressor
> either.

Well, for "simple" compression, the SC* compressors are kind of a standard and 
perform well. And guess what jamin is using:-)

But jamin really is overkill when used for a single channel, most single-
channel signals are mono and jamin introduces a delay of ~10ms which isn't 
compensated for by ardour as an "insert" doesn't have a chance to have a 
output port named "latency" to report its intrinsic latency...

Arnold
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20100901/adb3c658/attachment-0002.pgp>