[Ardour-Users] Ardour 2.8.5 released
Jason.Russler at gmail.com
Jason.Russler at gmail.com
Mon Jan 25 07:38:53 PST 2010
No doubt you're right. But for me, it's a tired, old discussion around here
- I'ma little sorry I hit "send": The major hindrance for myself is clean,
caveat-free VST/VSTi integration. I use a couple of licensed Native
Instruments products. That means Ardour for Windows in my case because of
the software activation mechanisms - though if I switched to Mac this
problem could be moot. I would kill a man for Jack/Ardour/VSTi with the
orchestral VST instruments I have to use. I have no idea how
possible/impossible it would be (both in the technical and licensing sense)
to make a VST instrument work trouble-free as a JACK client, but it would
be pure heaven.
I don't use a Mac, but if someone here has had success using Ardour with
NI's Play Instrument, any simple MIDI sequencer and video sync with JACK's
transport, I want to hear about it. I'd ditch my Windows/Sonar Producer
set-up in a second.
On Jan 25, 2010 10:08am, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Jason Russler jason.russler at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Project studios in people's basements for
> > various types of independent production make up a much larger market
> > in pure volume and there are more and more of them. Ardour isn't
> > designed to reach them and everyone knows how steep the technical and
> > licensing difficulties are to get into that arena.
> what makes you say this? i would guess that by far the largest chunk
> of ardour users fit into this general category.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20100125/ff1847d9/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Ardour-Users
mailing list