[Ardour-Users] Could this solve Ardour's financial headache?

[moron]

On Thursday 08 January 2009 08:58:54 John Emmas wrote:
> That's fine Mark.  There'd be nothing to stop you doing that - but if you
> distribute the source to Mr X who later decides he wants SVN updates, then
> he'll either have to pay $35 or keep pestering you all the time.

Howdy.  The GPL requires that if you use other GPL source and you distribute 
the results, your source must be made freely available.  You can charge a 
*small* fee for stuff like a CD containing the source but it still must be made 
available.  

If you are going to distribute via private SVN wouldn't Ardour have to be 
entirely clean of any GPL source (and then presumably dual licensed)?

Cheers

-- 
http://industrial.org 
http://noise.industrial.org 
http://deterrent.net/griefer
http://codegrunt.com
Whomever dies with the most URLs wins!!!!!!!!!!!!!