[Ardour-Users] Portable Sessions

[Arnold Krille]

Am Dienstag, 18. September 2007 schrieb Thomas Vecchione:
> The other problem I believe I see is when doing so the Jack ports for the
> interface change, and would need to be reconnected.  That is not as big a
> deal so long as the rest of the routing remain for me, but it would be nice
> to account for this in some way, just not sure what the best way is.

This depends on the jack-version you are using. Until 0.103.X (last stable 
release) the names of the hardware depended on the driver. So with alsa its 
alsa_pcm:capture_X and alsa_pcm:playback_X and on freebob its freebob_pcm:*
Ardour would still connect the master output to the first two hardware outputs 
but other connections could get lost and ardour will tell you about missing 
devices.

In Jack-svn the hardware-devices always have the same name (alias?) no matter 
which driver (alsa, freebob, firewire). So it seems the devs already thought 
about this and are changing it. :-)

Arnold
-- 
visit http://www.arnoldarts.de/
---
Hi, I am a .signature virus. Please copy me into your ~/.signature and send me 
to all your contacts.
After a month or so log in as root and do a rm / -rf. Or ask your 
administrator to do so...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20070918/1f449641/attachment-0002.pgp>