[ardour-users] 48 channels on ardour

[Thomas Vecchione]

But for the examples I listed above, is not an option usually as playback is
not happening in Ardour;)

But thanks for the heads up on it for other settings(Such as home studio)

                  Seablade

On 7/18/07, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2007-07-18 at 13:07 -0500, Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> > Danged Reply-All requirement again...
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: Thomas Vecchione <seablaede at gmail.com>
> > Date: Jul 18, 2007 1:07 PM
> > Subject: Re: [ardour-users] 48 channels on ardour
> > To: Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com>
> >
> >
> >
> > On 7/18/07, Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >         Insanity.
> >
> >
> >
> > Not going to argue that the Ardour software raid is not nice(Though I
> > personally haven't used it, the concept is nice at least;), however
> > see my posts for two specific instances where it is, a, EXTREMELY easy
> > to set this up, and B, VERY useful.  And at least one of those
> > instances (Recording a live gig with backing tracks) is far from
> > uncommon.  Personally I do the second version a fair amount.
> >
> > Now in as far as moving audio between recorded takes, it would
> > certainly be nice if some software would do it for you, but it is a
> > good way of stretching a limited setup and keeping it reliable.
>
>
> if you have multiple disks, ardour's s/w RAID support (whenever it
> works) will distribute newly captured data in a way that is more
> efficient than what you are attempting to do.
>
> --p
>
> >
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20070718/dfd7bcc2/attachment.htm>