[ardour-users] automation portability inquiry

plutek plutek at infinity.net
Fri Oct 27 05:23:56 PDT 2006


On Fri, 27 Oct 2006 00:33:34 -0500
Jan Depner <eviltwin69 at cableone.net> wrote:

> On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 23:14 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-10-26 at 20:02 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > Paul,
> > >    I would be disappointed if that was the case. I haven't done all
> > > that many sessions in Ardour but it would be a drag to not have them
> > > work anymore. I expect that there are other folks out there with far
> > > bigger problems than I would have though.
> > > 
> > >    If for some reason it doesn't make sense to put conversion into
> > > Ardour 2.0 is there a possibility that someone on the development team
> > > could provide a conversion program so that older sessions could be
> > > converted to 2.0 format before we load them?
> > 
> > this option would be my preference, yes.
> > 
> 
>     That would work for me.
> 
> 

separate conversion program is a fine option.


.pltk.



More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list