[ardour-users] Surround Sound Mixing and Panning
Hector Centeno-Garcia
h.centeno at sympatico.ca
Fri May 5 07:16:33 PDT 2006
Hello,
I found this unanswered thread pointing to the same problems I'm facing
now that I'm trying to use the surround panner in Ardour 99.3. I can add
to it that the panner in the editor mixer and in the general mixer never
mirror each other. I hope someone can share some commentaries about this
issues.
Thank you!
Hector.
Thomas Vecchione wrote:
> Hello-
>
> I apologize if this has been asked repeatedly... I am sure it has.
>
> I am currently having problems understanding the multi-channel
> panner, or else it seems a bit buggy.
>
> Taking a mono channel in a project with 5 outputs, the panner for
> the channel has a single blue puck, and 5 orange squares. I would
> assume the orange squares would represent the inputs to the master
> track and the blue puck would represent the output of the source
> track. Moving the 5 orange squares to a setup similar to the 5
> speakers in a 5.1 surround set up I can move the blue puck around and
> see differences in the send levels going out of the track. However
> these dont seem to match up correctly to the proximity of the blue
> puck to the respective speakers, and I never completly lose signal to
> any speaker, say if I wanted to pan a track hard into the front left
> speaker and none of the others.
>
> On the master track I have the same 5 squares, but now I have 5 blue
> pucks to move around, I am a bit confused on this. I would think that
> either I would have one, or the other, but not both, but it seems I
> have both and am confused as to that. It would seem on the master
> track panner I would place the locations of the inputs into the master
> track in the 2d panner, and the source track panner I would place the
> location of the output of the source track.
>
> So I am a bit confused as to why I have 5 meters I believe showing
> outputs into each of the master tracks inputs on the source track. It
> would seem to me that I should only have a single LED meter on the
> output of that track, as I might not choose to send that track
> directly to the master ports and send it instead to a stereo bus which
> I then pan into the master track. So if someone could explain to me
> why this is, or how I am misunderstanding it I would appreciate it
> greatly.
>
> I am also a bit confused why I have the 5 orange squares and 5 blue
> pucks in the master track panner. Again see above, to me it would
> make sense for this only to allow me to place the inputs into the
> master track. The outputs I would assume would be fixed into various
> ports typically and cant find a reason for this not to be the case.
>
> I would love to use ardour for multitrack mixing and I tihnk it has
> great capabilities, but I seem to be misunderstanding some of the
> implementations of it and would love some help in figuring it out.
>
> Another thing I have noticed is when editing ANY of the above
> features of the panners in the Editor Mixer(Not the mixer window)
> whenever I switch to a different track and come back it has reset to
> its defaults and none of my edits stay. I would assume this to be a
> bug but want to double check since i am having so many problems.
>
> So any help? ..... Bewler?
>
> Seablade
> _______________________________________________
> ardour-users-ardour.org mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
> On further inspection I think I am getting closer to writing this off
> as a rather annoying and possibly severe bug in multi-channel mixing...
>
> It appears that the orange squares, no matter where you move them on
> the track, or the master do not actually update, or dont seem to be to
> me. However moving the puck around corresponds correctly to the
> original positions of the orange squares with regards to levels on the
> output(?) meters of that channel.
>
> However second part of this is there is no difference with moving the
> puck around with regards to the levels of the meters on the master strip.
>
> So if I could get confirmation that this is a bug and I am not doing
> something completly stupid I will be more than glad to submit it to
> mantis, I didnt see anything like this when I looked there earlier
> tonight, but it doesnt mean I didnt miss it, so feel free to tell me
> if it is already there;)
>
> Seablade
> _______________________________________________
> ardour-users-ardour.org mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>
More information about the Ardour-Users
mailing list