[ardour-users] Re: Effects and latency

Mark Knecht markknecht at gmail.com
Mon May 16 08:39:11 PDT 2005

On 5/16/05, Esben Stien <b0ef at esben-stien.name> wrote:
> Mark Knecht <markknecht at gmail.com> writes:
> > I couldn't get it to work even with some of the apps that are
> > supposed to support it.
> Me neither, I got it up and running, did some tests with the synth and
> the other app and it just segfaulted. I was able to almost restore a
> jack-rack, but it was empty and the server died.

Best to keep this discussion on a user's list. If we talked about this
on XXXX-dev someone would tell us to fix it. ;-)

Still, I find that I react pretty stongly to what I read as the
sentiment in Paul's comment "Maybe, but we don't have much choice. 
Ardour is not going to save settings for jackrack; jackrack is not
going to save settings for amsynth; etc etc." I don't want to say that
it's not going to get better - better defined as what user's want to
use vs. what developer's want to develop. It's not all that far apart
right now but imagine the application that could be created by pooling
the developer talent in the Ardour, Rosegarden and Muse teams, just to
name a few, and coupling that with a user vision of where to go. I
think it would be amazing. As it is "Ardour is not going to save ..."

- Mark

More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list