[ardour-users] Ardour needs a forum
D. R. Evans
N7DR at arrl.net
Tue Aug 30 06:02:07 PDT 2005
Steve Robinson said the following at 2005-08-30 01:41 :
> The Ardour mailing list is extremely active .....too
> active. If I have ever seen the need for a forum this
> is it.
I disagree -- unless the forum/fora are gatewayed to one or more mail
reflectors, so that people who prefer e-mail can continue to receive the
information that way.
With a forum, you have to fire up a web browser and you have to make the
effort to go and read the information instead of having it all delivered
automatically to one's mailbox in a near-real-time basis. The e-mail is at
least as nicely threaded as any forum. And one has the archives local, and
can flag important messages for easy retrieval. I for one can find things
in e-mail archives many, many times faster than finding it through some
search function for a web site.
> If one is looking for info on something it is very
> difficult to find. One has to search thru a mass of
> mail archives. It's a daunting task.
I don't understand this statement. "Search Messages..." works fine in TB.
Something equivalent is available in any decent e-mail client. Perhaps I am
missing the point somehow?
PS The whole forum phenomenon has mystified me for a while. I can't think
of a single advantage compared to e-mail, and there seem to be a whole ton
of disadvantages. Actually, I guess that's not true -- I suppose that it is
easier to have categories in a forum; but the tiny amount of traffic on the
ardour reflectors doesn't seem to justify categories. I have to disagree
that the volume on ardour-users is high; it's one of the least active
reflectors to which I subscribe -- and has one of the highest
signal-to-noise ratios. Although I suspect that this posting is adding to
the noise :-(
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
More information about the Ardour-Users