[ardour-users] Ardour not using available memory?
scott at scotthelmke.com
Thu Apr 29 08:46:08 PDT 2004
On Thursday 29 April 2004 10:44, philicorda wrote:
> Scott Helmke wrote:
> >Thanks to CCRMA I've finally gotten Ardour somewhat usable, but with some
> >frustrating limitations. And still xruns, oy vey...
> >Anyway, I suspect things would improve a lot if I could:
> >1. Lower CPU usage. It's an Athlon 2600 or thereabouts, and with about
> > 10 tracks recorded, 4 actually playing back, and a very few plugins
> > (simple compressor on 2-3 tracks, single parametric on 2 tracks, and
> > Gverb on one track) the CPU load is around 50%.
> >2. Increase memory actually used. I've got a full Gb, but top shows
> > only about half actually being used. Ardour uses around 150Mb, and
> > shows a lot of disk activity even when I just jump back to the start of
> > the song after a playback. It's definitely getting stuff back off disk
> > even in playback.
> >P.S. Audio card is Delta-44, and I'm recording at 44.1/16.
> The cpu usage seems rather high. Playing back 11 tracks with the roughly
> the same amount of plugins takes about 40% of my p3 550. (Accourding to
> ardour CPU meter anyway, which I am not sure is quite accurate.)
> What buffer size are you using? I use 1024 samples at 44.1k. Are you
> using realtime? (Launch jackd with -R, this can help quite a bit)
> This is with the tarball from last night, so perhaps more recent
> versions are more efficient?
I'm running whatever is currently at Planet CCRMA, including the kernel.
Fedora Core 1, since I haven't mentioned that already.
jackd -R -d alsa -r 44100
which defaults to 1024 for the buffer.
---- Scott Helmke ---- scott at scotthelmke.com ---- (734) 604-9340 ----
And you'll visualize not taking any chances
But meet them halfway with love, peace, and persuasion
And expect them to rise to the occasion
(from "Glad Tidings", by Van Morrison)
More information about the Ardour-Users