[ardour-dev] Re: [ardour-users] MTC & MMC - CORRECTION
Third Option
thirdoption at hotmail.com
Wed Sep 22 18:53:58 PDT 2004
> >tempo - it's not time code)
>
> this is not your only error, i'm afraid.
yeah no shit. this is getting deeper than I really understand.
> because no Linux box can currently deliver MTC correctly. it requires
> an interrupt-driven timer with a resolution measured in hundreds of
> usecs. approximate it using 1msec timer? perhaps. but some devices
> won't lock to it.
talking with Larry Lines (also on this list - he lurks a lot) on messenger -
this was interesting that he just said about that:
(20:45:02) :p larry: but you could bypass the kernel and generate your own
timeclock so that the kernel developers would stop fucking it up
> >> deals with MTC and NOT straight SMPTE.
>
> but MTC is a discrete "packetized" protocol; SMPTE is a continuous
> stream. guess what kind of signal ardour handles more easily ...
*LAUGH AND LAUGH*
> as mentioned above, there are very big differences in implementation
> details that make a huge difference.
right, for you ;) not for the end user, baby! :)
> you can send SMPTE over any audio connection.
yeah you can send it but you can't understand it - for example - Cakewalk
for DOS - it doesn't have a way to read that. what about my setup,
behringer ddx3216 mixer and an HDSP 9652 - there's no connection - first of
all, "smpte out" on the HDSP - theorhetically I could route a smpte stream
to an audio channel, but that I know of, the DDX doesn't have a way to
translate that - - see what I'm getting at?
all things I'm willing to work around but I'm sort of pushing for ardour
being viable in more places - which is of course what you're pushing for too
so hey we're on the same page there :)
> the point is this: there is nothing about MTC that requires that a
> slave has to chase it at all times. you might consider that a good
now see THIS I didn't know - I thought the EXACT opposite
> ADAT sync is easily handleable, but currently no ALSA driver provides
> ADAT sync to user-space. the code in ardour has been designed to
> handle any positional sync source.
the thing about ADAT sync that makes it lower priority to me is that there's
not a lot of sound cards that have the 9 pin sync thing - my HDSP does - but
MOST have audio and MIDI
> it includes a Locate command, which is more like what you are thinking
> of.
yeah - locate - I kept calling that song position pointer, hence my
correction mail
>
> --p
>
More information about the Ardour-Dev
mailing list