[ardour-dev] Two jack servers? (One internal to Ardour)
dgatwood at mac.com
Mon Dec 13 10:23:03 PST 2004
On Dec 12, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> An alternative idea would be some way of marking Ardour's internal
>>> connections in such a way that tools like QJC do not display them.
>>> From my POV connections internal to Ardour should not be meddled with
>>> in QJC, but I'm make so many connections in Ardour that QJC's
>>> connections page is becoming a frustration instead of the tool it
>>> usually is.
>>> Again, just thinking aloud about how to make the tools and
>>> environment more friendly.
>> Good idea. Maybe Rui could give QJC an option to ignore connections
>> from a client to itself.
> I copied Rui on the first message thinking that this would be the
> simplest solution. I'm not sure what the right answer is. Maybe there
> are some internal connections you want to see, but I think most you
> don't want. Maybe some button to display/hide connections from an app
> to itself would give people the most flexibility.
Seems to me like the right visual image is one Jack, multiple
Maybe add something like:
as an attribute for each jack connection (with default zero). Make the
description of those port types be defined by the application, but have
a handful of predefined defaults for commonly-used connections, e.g.
"Output to Audio Interface", "Input from Audio Interface", etc. Better
yet, have two such attributes---one describing the source and one
describing the destination.
Add either a mechanism for the app to upload a list of port type
descriptions upon connecting or add an optional callback mechanism
for Jack to request such a description when asked by QJC and other
Then in such an app, you could have multiple patchbay windows,
each set to filter by a given port type or the user could combine them
as desired simply by checking or unchecking the check mark in a
pop-up "filter" menu in a given window. The default should probably
be "all connections on".
More information about the Ardour-Dev