<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 10/19/2016 05:11 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFa_cKnD3yd0ZXK0tnaWU9hu+aavHAYK6N6YGQbo1b1uPWCywg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr"><br>
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt
0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204);
padding-left: 1ex;"><span class="">
</span>So subsequent pastes append the last paste to the
end of the previous<br>
paste??<br>
<br>
Would it not be more logical for each paste to INSERT at
the playhead<br>
position, and move previous pastes to the right the
appropriate amount?<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Why is that more logical? The "paste" command is used
over and over - it means that paste in one context means
"move data then paste" and in another means "just paste".
Want to explain your thinking?<br>
</div>
<div> <br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
Mainly so a "paste" always occurs at the cursor/readhead location,
instead of some location which may, or may not, be visible. It
would seem that it would be a more consistent behavior so you would
always be certain precisely where you are pasting current material.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>