<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 03/03/2011 02:26 PM, Bernardo Barros wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTi=G2ZWg1YQLN2KoyLuJakAj8FHcGGEh5KCNu2tY@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">2011/3/3 Kim Cascone <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:kim@anechoicmedia.com"><kim@anechoicmedia.com></a>:
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">so in that light baudline *is* indeed *free* -- but you are correct in that
it is not *open source*
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap="">
By definition usually adopted in computing/linux (since we are on
ardour mailing list :-), it is neither free nor open source.</pre>
</blockquote>
I stand corrected - I meant free as in 'free of charge' not in free
to redistribute or copy<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTi=G2ZWg1YQLN2KoyLuJakAj8FHcGGEh5KCNu2tY@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap=""> If we
were talking in another language, maybe it would be clearer when we
refer to freedom or gratuity. "Livre" and "gratis" in portuguese, for
instance. :-)
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>