<html>
<head>
<style>
P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
I have lots of space for building, but not for installing.<br>I would be very glad if I was able to build a boost of about 50Mb.<br>But I'm not prepared to try out every possible configure-switch to boost,<br>until it works with ardour.<br>lieven<br><br>> Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 12:28:55 -0400<br>> From: paul@linuxaudiosystems.com<br>> Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] FW: boost libs<br>> To: lievenmoors@hotmail.com<br>> CC: ardour-users@lists.ardour.org<br>> <br>> On Thu, 2007-08-16 at 18:08 +0200, Lieven Moors wrote:<br>> > <br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ______________________________________________________________<br>> > From: lievenmoors@hotmail.com<br>> > To: taybin@penguinsounds.org<br>> > Subject: RE: [Ardour-Users] boost libs<br>> > Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 18:07:15 +0200<br>> > <br>> > This is not true. Installing boost from source takes more than<br>> > 328 Megs ! (I don't know how much more)<br>> > That is, if you don't specify which libraries it should leave<br>> > out with the --without-libraries switch to configure.<br>> > The previous ardour executable takes only 7.2 Megs.<br>> <br>> tayin was referring to the amount of space required to build ardour:<br>> about 1GB! the rpm on my system for boost is about 2.6MB, the<br>> development rpm clocks in at about 49MB.<br>> <br>> > The libraries that require separate compilation are:<br>> > test, wave, graph, regex, date_time, signals, serialization,<br>> > iostreams, filesystem, python, thread, program_options<br>> > and ar all compiled by default.<br>> > I still wonder if ardour needs all of it, or none.<br>> <br>> ardour doesn't need it, but nobody that i know who is working on<br>> developing ardour has any interest in spending the time required to<br>> figure out what you strip out and what you cannot.<br>> <br>> --p<br>> <br>> <br></body>
</html>