Danged Reply-All requirement again...<br><br>---------- Forwarded message ----------<br><span class="gmail_quote">From: <b class="gmail_sendername">Thomas Vecchione</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com
</a>><br>Date: Jul 18, 2007 1:07 PM<br>Subject: Re: [ardour-users] 48 channels on ardour<br>To: Mark Knecht <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org">email@example.com</a>><br><br></span><br><br><div><span class="q">
<span class="gmail_quote">On 7/18/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Mark Knecht</b> <<a href="mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">email@example.com</a>> wrote:
</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>Insanity.</blockquote></span><div><br><br><br>Not going to argue that the Ardour software raid is not nice(Though I personally haven't used it, the concept is nice at least;), however see my posts for two specific instances where it is, a, EXTREMELY easy to set this up, and B, VERY useful. And at least one of those instances (Recording a live gig with backing tracks) is far from uncommon. Personally I do the second version a fair amount.
<br><br>Now in as far as moving audio between recorded takes, it would certainly be nice if some software would do it for you, but it is a good way of stretching a limited setup and keeping it reliable.<br><br> Seablade