[Ardour-Users] One piano roll to edit them all

Stuzz stuzz78 at yahoo.com.au
Tue Aug 16 16:56:33 PDT 2016


Why not use Ardour to do "anything real on Winders"? :)

On Wed, 17 Aug 2016 09:46:34 +1000, Brett McCoy <idragosani at gmail.com>  
wrote:

> I'm stuck taking Pro Tools classes right now (degree requirement) ...  
> for the price tag it boasts, not terribly impressed. I've gotten to used  
> to Ardour & >MixBus and find Pro Tools clumsy in a lot of areas. If I  
> ever need to do anything real on Winders, I reach for Reaper!
>
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Tobiasz Karoń <unfa00 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Pro Tools - I think I made a mistake here - yes, that's probably one  
>> reason why I never want to use it again after I finished the school ;)
>> I should replace it with Fruity Loops then.
>>
>> 2016-08-17 1:28 GMT+02:00 Brett McCoy <idragosani at gmail.com>:
>>> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Tobiasz Karoń <unfa00 at gmail.com>  
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Any DAW I have worked in: Cubase, Logic, Pro Tools, Reaper, LMMS -  
>>>> has one main piano roll for editing all MIDI data in the project. I  
>>>> have >>>>sequenced and published several hours music in LMMS over the  
>>>> last few years, but I am pulling my hair put trying to finish one  
>>>> single  track in >>>>Ardour - just doing the same thing I've been  
>>>> doing for years. Suddenly it feels like I'm moving backwards.
>>> Have you seen Pro Tools recently? It uses the same model, editing MIDI  
>>> right in the track, and you can move back and forth between "clips"  
>>> >>>mode and &
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20160817/c9d95536/attachment.htm>


More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list