[Ardour-Users] Getting signals from Ardour
paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
Tue Oct 20 15:47:30 PDT 2015
One other minor issue with MCP. Most devices put labels on/near the
buttons. Most DAWs tend to completely ignore at least 50% of the labels and
re-use the buttons for other purposes. If you use one of the 5 DAWs for
which Mackie distributes a pre-printed adhesive overlay showing the way it
uses the device, you're stuck with the possibility of a key binding layout
that doesn't match the labels. More than a possibility: almost a guarantee.
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:44 PM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Chris Caudle <chris at chriscaudle.org>
>> > 1) read up on the Mackie Control specs to understand how the (2-way)
>> > communication works in theory.
>> Are there any other control protocols currently supported? I know in the
>> past Euphonix had promoted a different protocol which was transported over
>> Ethernet. I think the marketing name for it in their products was
>> EuControl. I remember reading an AES preprint on it years ago, but I
>> don't know if it was ever used by other manufacturers. Seems like I only
>> find Aavid controllers now when I search for EuCon, so I guess now.
> the original EuCon protocol was described in a white paper. It is
> extremely complex, and seems designed around the interesting but ultimately
> extremely non-real-world idea of a surface reporting its layout and
> capabilities to the DAW and then the DAW deciding what to do with with
> them. Super cool, except that I have yet to see a surface that reconfigured
> itself. I am not clear on whether Avid have modified the protocol since
> they acquired Euphonix.
>> I was just checking the SmartAV controller, which supports several
>> different DAW over Ethernet, and it seems to use Mackie protocol or
>> similar variants as MIDI over IP, but when used with Pyramix uses a
>> protocol referred to as OASIS.
>> "Oasis (Open Audio System Integration Solution) is an open source remote
>> control protocol, designed to bring the entire DAW application out onto a
>> remote interface."
> Frankly, Mackie Control can accomplish this. Note that MIDI-over-IP is
> distinct from Mackie Control. Ardour already supports Mackie devices that
> use ipMIDI (such as the SSL Nucleus) with dedicated ipMIDI support (no need
> for bridging software).
>> It just seems that MCP is a little convoluted, and there should be a
>> better way using modern protocols to control a DAW. Is OSC the best bet
>> for that?
> MCP is very far from convoluted. In general, its a nice piece of work. It
> has one major limitation: no more than 8 faders/strips (+ 1 optional master
> fader) per MIDI port. This is pretty nasty.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Ardour-Users