[Ardour-Users] latency accuracy

Paul Davis paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
Fri Oct 25 12:18:14 PDT 2013


Ignore ardour's.

Latency has many definitions. You are seeing different meanings of the word
in different places.


On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 3:07 PM, muzzol <muzzol at muzzol.com> wrote:

> hi,
>
> I know qjackctl is doing an estimation on latency, but how accurate is
> ardour ?
>
> I currently have 512 frames/period, 3 periods/buffer and 48kh
>
> qjack is showing 32 msec and ardour 10.7ms
>
> how accurate is that?
>
>
> muzzol
>
>
> --
> ========================
>      ^ ^
>      O O
>     (_ _)
> muzzol(a)muzzol.com
> ========================
> jabber id: muzzol(a)jabber.dk
> ========================
> No atribueixis qualitats humanes als ordinadors.
> No els hi agrada.
> ========================
> "El gobierno español sólo habla con terroristas, homosexuales y
> catalanes, a ver cuando se decide a hablar con gente normal"
> Jiménez Losantos
> ========================
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20131025/45ea8535/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list