[Ardour-Users] 2.8 on os x 10.9?

[Horst Birthelmer]

Hi,

I don’t use Ardour that much (until Ardour 3 is usable with AU plugins) but Harrison Mixbus, which is based on Ardour 2 works fine for me on Mavericks.
I’ve done two complete mixdowns so far after the update and haven’t noticed any bad problems. 
The only thing that was noticeable is that the GUI of plugins is somewhat slower. I didn’t expect that …  but it’s no big deal.

Horst

On 01 Nov 2013, at 15:18, . m u r m e r . <murmer at murmerings.com> wrote:

> i will! might take awhile, though, have to find a machine running mavericks to try it on. don't want to upgrade my own machine unless i know it works, i rely too much on ardour.
> 
> best,
> patrick
> 
> 
> On 2013.11.01 15:46 , Paul Davis wrote:
>> Nobody has tested it and reported back. Please feel free to do so :)
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 9:36 AM, . m u r m e r . <murmer at murmerings.com
>> <mailto:murmer at murmerings.com>> wrote:
>> 
>>    i currently use ardour 2.8.16 on os x 10.6 (snow leopard) often and
>>    reliably. i'm considering the free upgrade to os x 10.9 (mavericks),
>>    but i see ardour hasn't been tested there yet. has anyone tried 2.x
>>    on mavericks? i only find things about 3.x in the forums.
>> 
>>    thanks,
>>    patrick
>> 
>>    --
>> 
>>    ||| http://www.murmerings.com |||
>>    _________________________________________________
>>    Ardour-Users mailing list
>>    ardour-users at lists.ardour.org <mailto:ardour-users at lists.ardour.org>
>>    http://lists.ardour.org/__listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-__ardour.org
>>    <http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org>
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> |||  http://www.murmerings.com |||
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org