[Ardour-Users] Linux distributions

[Casey Shultz]

I'm paying close attention to this thread because I'm thinking through the
process of making my new DAW based on Ardour 3. New machine. New OS.
On Oct 1, 2011 1:24 PM, "Ralf Mardorf" <ralf.mardorf at alice-dsl.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 21:15 +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-10-01 at 11:56 -0700, Bernardo Barros wrote:
>> > If one uses ArchLinux (or derivatives like ArchBang)
>> > and a intel corei processor, I uploaded my local repository here:
>> >
>> > http://bbarros.com/archstudio/
>> >
>> > It works great for me, the best results I ever had.
>> > But probably I'm still the only user so far.
>> > It's based on ArchAudio packages, which I'm also a contributor.
>> >
>> > just my $0.01
>> >
>> > Best!
>>
>> I call Arch Linux a "special" kind of distro ;). Very often I could tune
>> my Ubuntu or Debian, regarding to information that came from hits about
>> ArchLinux by Google. I never installed Arch myself, but I only heard
>> good news from Arch :).
>
> Broken English
>
>> Hearsay, no special order: Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora aka planet ...,
>> Arch ...
>
> should be good
>
>> I wonder why Rui likes Suse for audio :D, I'm using it for
>> other needs ... no doubt about it, AVLinux, the outdated 64 Studio ...
>> and indeed some exotic distros might be good too, but it's risky.
>
> also could be good, while others might be ok too, but tend to be risky,
> since not that much used.
>
>>
>> Arch, of cause, has very good information in the world wide web, that
>> helps to pimp every distro :).
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20111001/f97f5792/attachment-0001.htm>