[Ardour-Users] Fw: can't get midi to work

[Nick Ramm]

Thanks again for all the feedback.
It looks like i've got 3 options..
1)stick with Lucid and attempt to upgrade Jack.
2)upgrade to a newer version of ubuntu 11.04 or 11.10 and hence ardour 2.8.11/2.8.12

3)Start over with a different OS e.g. Av Linux which looks interesting

Then i'll finally be able to start talking about Ardour 3




________________________________
From: Chooch Schubert <choochus at gmail.com>
To: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
Sent: Friday, 30 September 2011, 18:00
Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] Fw: can't get midi to work

I started using the KXStudio repositories for Ubuntu about six months
ago and was absolutely blown away by it. There is a simple page of
instruction on how to get up and running that just about anybody can
follow including: which version of Ubuntu to install, how to add
repositories, and how to minimize latency. They now also support
ArchLinux and support Gnome, KDE and Unity.

After about 45 minutes of downloads and one or two reboots I had a
machine with the latest versions of all major media software; the
whole system running on JACK; midi, pulseaudio, and alsa working in
harmony; 5ms latency for recording and playback; the use of most
plugins (LV2, DSSI, LADSPA, Linux VST and even most Windows VST and
VSTi) and everything "just works". I highly recommend it to any
musician or video producer who wants to get into production with
Linux.

http://kxstudio.sourceforge.net


  {c}


On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 9:11 AM, m.eik michalke <m at openmusiccontest.org> wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> am Freitag 30 September 2011 (14:40) schrieb Thomas Vecchione:
> > It isn't that Ubuntu can't be used, it is that it tends to be more of
> > a headache than anything especially for new users.  They tend to break
> > the distribution packages of Ardour in subtle but annoying ways, and
> > they are specific to Ubuntu.
>
> it's probably just not enough headache yet to get it working ;-) i mean,
> someone could just create an alternative repository with proper builds, or
> register another launchpad project, also to deliver automatic daily builds
> from svn etc.
>
> > and their tendenecy to update packages a bit on the slow side(2.8.6 is how
> > many years old now?)
>
> nick is just using an old ubuntu release. lucid lynx was released in april
> 2010, ardour 2.8.6 three months before that:
>  o http://ardour.org/node/3295
>
> i find that acceptable. the 11.10 release has 2.8.11.
>  o https://launchpad.net/ardour
>
>
> viele grüße :: m.eik
>
> --
> ::: http://OpenMusicContest.org   :: music wants to be free
>  :                                :
>  .:                                : http://reaktanz.de/blog
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
>
_______________________________________________
Ardour-Users mailing list
ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
http://lists.ardour.org/listinfo.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/private.cgi/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20111001/b3c32eac/attachment.htm>