[Ardour-Users] Hardy or Jaunty
Kees van Veen
kees.vanveen at gmail.com
Mon Oct 12 23:39:24 PDT 2009
I can confirm this, had serious trouble with high cpu loads (and xruns)
with the rt kernel that Jaunty ships with, while with Hardy I didn't
have these problems. I upgraded because of jackd which is vs. 116 in
Jaunty, Hardy has 109.
I 'solved' it by installing 188.8.131.52-rt8-custom as mentioned in
(downloaded the one from Travis Carter). Running fine with that kernel now.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Ardour-Users] Hardy or Jaunty
From: Mark Greenwood <fatgerman at ntlworld.com>
To: ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
Date: Mon Oct 12 2009 20:18:24 GMT+0200 (CEST)
> On Monday 12 Oct 2009 15:28:12 teza wrote:
>> Hi everybody it is worth to update to ubuntustudio to Jaunty?
>> All your feedback are welcome.
>> Thanks for your help.
>> Regards From Paris
> Depends. If you're using a realtime kernel then no, definitely not. The rt kernels in Jaunty are seriously broken (or they were when I tried them anyway) and do not work at all on mutliprocessor machines. It's not an Ubunutu-specific problem, there were simply serious issues with the rt-kernel patch at that time.
> On the plus side, the very latest 2.6.31 kernel has almost realtime performance as stock, and enabling preempt on it gives better performance than any previous realtime kernel - at least in my experience. My advice is, if you want to upgrade, wait for Karmic.
>> Ardour-Users mailing list
>> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
> Ardour-Users mailing list
> ardour-users at lists.ardour.org
More information about the Ardour-Users