[Ardour-Users] Ardour 2.8 released

[Ray Rashif]

I'm thinking plain simple separate package, i.e ardourvst-i686.pkg will
conflict with ardour-i686.pkg. It will include:

# /usr/share/applications/ardourvst.desktop
Name=Ardour
Exec=/usr/bin/ardourvst

Majority of the stuff in the package, as already mentioned, is
ardourvst-specific.

I had initially thought of replacing ardour, though. In fact, even after
reading your justification, I still think it'd be better to just do that.
There's no need for an lmms-vst, if I recall. Or qtractor-vst..hmm wait,
what does Rui have to say?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ardour.org/pipermail/ardour-users-ardour.org/attachments/20090329/9e2d22e1/attachment-0001.htm>