[Ardour-Users] OSX vs Linu
m at openmusiccontest.org
Sun Aug 23 14:23:03 PDT 2009
am Sonntag, 23. August 2009 (22:18) schrieb John Emmas:
> My personal view is that driver installtion & configuration remains the
> greatest bugbear with Linux. Apple has solved this neatly by heavily
> restricting the user's choice of hardware but Microsoft has the same
> problem on almost the same scale as Linux.
i beg to differ, honestly. try to run windows on an amiga, atari, sun sparc,
ibm s/390 or your hardware router, to name but a few. i admit those are a
little off the scope here, but microsoft is more or less exclusively
interested in its os for the intel pc, whereas e.g. debian installs on all
those architectures (and more: http://www.debian.org/ports/).
perhaps more relevant is that older hardware is less likely supported by newer
versions of windows, nor will a huge amount of new components run with older
versions of windows. and i've had my share of buggy drivers there as well ;-)
the fact that gnu/linux is perceived as DIY is probably to an extend caused by
the *ability* to get things working if they don't at first. if a driver is
missing or too old in windows, you're simply screwed, which is of course less
considering the market share of windows compared with the user basis of linux
and seeing what both systems are capable of, microsoft doesn't really impress
> Microsoft's approach has been to unify hardware and software manufacturers
> with its MSI installation strategy (the ubiquitous "setup.exe" file). Well
> configured MSI installers have completely removed the pain of installing
> both drivers and apps under Windows
i haven't checked that for a while, but does this apply to the pain of
removing them again without relicts as well? not to mention the pain of
software updates (my windows experiences were always if update mechanisms were
implemented at all, each program did it differently, and automation was
> With the increased usage of package managers, installing applications under
> Linux has become similarly painless.
speaking for my experiences with apt i must say that package management unter
linux is much more sophisticated than anything i have lived through with
windows. i don't know a single windows user who managed to upgrade from a used
2000 to XP and from XP to vista without formatting at least once because of
the grown mess. and even if you decide to do a clean new linux installation,
you just import the package list of your previous installed software and use
your old home directory, and that's usually enough to go on where you stopped.
in addition, under windows you can't just call to update every installed
package at once, if updates are available, or call to install this and that
program without downloading it somewhere from some homepage first.
i absolutely see it the other way round: there's been a lot of improvement in
windows, but it's still a long way to go until software management is that
comfortable as it has been under linux for years.
> Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for installing drivers. There are
> probably as many different strategies as there are driver writers, which is
> a great letdown.
but nowadays there's rarely the need to install drivers manually, isn't there?
this might by wrong for exotic hardware or proprietary drivers. they are
usually a "simple" kernel module that needs to be loaded (can be managed by
DKMS). at least in my office at work it's always the windows users who are
fighting with drivers and installation cd-roms, where i just plugged in the
new monitor, the new usb device or scanned the network for the new printer --
and then simply used it without installing anything. you can get used to that
if you invest some time *before* you buy hardware, you can circumvent most
showstoppers effectively. but that goes for every os, i think.
for instance, i bought an alesis i|o2 a while ago, to record ideas at home
quickly. i plugged it in and it just worked on three linux systems (64bit
desktop, thinkpad and samsung nc10). i've done three hour long uniterrupted
recordings without hiccups. that is, there are success stories without digging
in config files.
best regards :: m.eik
::: http://OpenMusicContest.org :: music wants to be free
.: : http://reaktanz.de/blog
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
More information about the Ardour-Users