[Ardour-Users] Missing Squiggles

[Ken Restivo]

On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 05:32:53PM +0000, philicorda wrote:
> 
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 23:15 -0800, Ken Restivo wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 12:00:08AM +0100, Wolfgang Woehl wrote:
> > > Montag, 26. November 2007 Ken Restivo:
> > > 
> > > > Nope. These are normalized, full-volume tracks. And they play that way. And
> > > > they show up on the meters fully in the yellow. Just no squiggles (which
> > > > I'm told are properly called "waveforms").
> > > 
> > > You say "squiggles" one more time and I'm going to faint. Yuk! I can never 
> > > look at ardour sessions again without waves forming in my stomach.
> > 
> > I seem to have a unique ability to make certain people nauseous. It's completely unintentional.
> > 
> > The auto-pan Rhodes sound that I use in nearly all my music, makes some people "seasick" (so I have been told).
> > 
> > Now I've found a simple *word* to *type* that makes people faint!
> 
> Of course it does. You should never call them 'squiggles'. I always use the correct technical term, 'furry caterpillars'. :)
> 

But, aren't those "eyebrows"?

-ken