[ardour-users] subscription push - keep ardour alive

Brett W. McCoy idragosani at gmail.com
Wed Jan 24 06:46:47 PST 2007

On 1/24/07, Allan Klinbail <sonofzev at iinet.net.au> wrote:

> For those that are concerned in production world .. ardour 0.99.3
> works.. ardour 2.x is our future but there is no shame in using 0.99.3
> until it is stable enough.. (yep I've completed tracks in both) and
> 0.99.3 is better than Cbase SX3.... but it's up to you

I have not had any problems at all with 0.99.3 -- I've spent the past
few weekend recording a band, 8 tracks going at once, no xruns or
crashes or anything. I am looking forward to migrating to 2.0 soon for
the sole reason if being able to use the Tranzport... but the new
interface is prettier also. I've never used Cubase, so I can't
comment. The only other DAW software I've used is Sonar HS4, and while
it's OK for some MIDI stuff, I hate it for most other things... trying
to be too many things at once. I prefer to old Unix philosophy, do one
thing and do it well, and the more distributed methodology of using
Jack with apps like Rosegarden, Ardour, etc.

-- Brett
"In the rhythm of music a secret is hidden;
    If I were to divulge it, it would overturn the world."
               -- Jelaleddin Rumi

More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list