[ardour-users] Files, created by Ardour, not recognized by anyother programm...

[Paul Davis]

On Tue, 2006-03-28 at 09:06 -0800, Kevin Cosgrove wrote:
> On 28 March 2006 at 11:49, Taybin Rutkin <taybin at earthlink.net> wrote:
> 
> > You won't want to go back to 0.99.x anyways once you've used
> > ardour2.  It's already mucho improve-o. :)
> 
> I wasn't thinking of reverting to the 0.99.x version due to ardour 
> itself.  Rather, I'd be operating with two different systems, one of 
> which might need a distribution update to be able to run ardour2.
> Knowing that I shouldn't count on being able to interoperate in both
> directions, from the version sense, lets me plan my whole upgrade 
> path a bit better.

the main problem with the 2.0 -> 0.99 direction is that there is data in
the session file for 2.0 that 0.99 knows nothing about. it will not
prevent it from loading in 0.99, but 0.99 will not restore that
information if it ever saves the session state.