[ardour-users] doing weird and unconscionable things with Ardour

Paul Davis paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
Tue Nov 29 06:41:37 PST 2005

On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 14:33 +0100, Per Sigmond wrote:
> Quoting Dave Phillips <dlphillips at woh.rr.com>:

> >   Amazingly, it worked and worked perfectly. Seq+ locked to the time
> > code without troubles and the recording was flawless. Another impressive
> > feature, perhaps most valuable to those of us still working with MIDI.
> >
> >   The fact that the time code works with a sequencer running under a DOS
> > emulator is a testament to the excellent programming skill that has gone
> > into Ardour and into Linux generally. I wonder how well this scenario
> > would work with, say, Cubase and Seq+, both running under XP. Is it even
> > possible ?
> Ardour works well both as MTC master (as you did) and as MTC slave provided that

I want to add that we owe Per a huge debt here, because he brought with
him lots of experience working on Jazz(++) and was responsible for
really tightening up Ardour's MTC support.

I am also glad that Dave's writing continues to implicitly recognize the
way that projects like Ardour are never the work of a single person. I
do claim a certain level of ownership here :), but the quality of Ardour
has as much to do with what others have brought to it than anything I
ever did.


More information about the Ardour-Users mailing list