[ardour-users] Ardour was not fast enough
Devin Venable
dvenable at valornet.com
Sun Jul 17 18:23:02 PDT 2005
Thanks Mark. I ran it like so and I'm in good shape now.
jackstart -R -d alsa -r 44100 -p 2048 -n 4 -d hw
BTW, someone asked what hardware I'm on. I'm pushing the envelope, for
being a cheapskate that is. I'm on a Sysmar 550---one of those cheap
$200 Wal-Mart boxes. Read more about it here:
http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=04/02/16/1711258&mode=thread
Other than this latest hiccup, I'm having great results. Best $200 hard
disk recorder ever. I love planetccrma and ardour.
On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 19:46, Mark Knecht wrote:
> No, I meant up the latency
>
> jackd -R -d alsa -r 44100 -p 1024 -n 2 -d hw
>
> Change the p and n parameters to get higher latencies and see what happens.
>
> Since I see that you may be on a 2.4 kernel so that may be jackstart
> in your case.
>
> On 7/17/05, Devin Venable <dvenable at valornet.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2005-07-17 at 15:07, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > > Does it happen if you slow down Jack itself? I'm seeing this with a
> > > number of Jack apps lately. It seems curiously more sensitive of late.
> > >
> >
> > By slow down do you mean reduce the sample rate? I can't bear to drop
> > it below 44100. I will try it once to see if the issue goes away and
> > will report if it does.
> >
> >
>
More information about the Ardour-Users
mailing list