[ardour-users] Re: [ardour-dev] Strange Issue WIth Automation in ardour-0.9_beta11
David R. Bergstein
dbergstein at comcast.net
Wed Feb 25 19:52:32 PST 2004
David R. Bergstein wrote:
> Paul Davis wrote:
>> Please notice the "[speed=8]" line. You were apparently
>> fast-forwarding when this happened. An 8-fold speed up is quite a lot,
>> especially if you have only 7200 RPM disks (or worse). If you weren't
>> ffwd-ing, we have some other bug to solve, because ardour thinks you
> Thanks for pointing that out. I was "playing" a bit with fast forward
> the same day well after the original errors were written to the log
> file. Here is a more typical set of events from 23Feb04 with
> transport Starting, sync poll of 1 clients for 2.000000 secs
> transport Rolling, 2.000000 sec left for poll
> load = 35.2009 max usecs: 4043.000, spare = 6623.000
> load = 36.4079 max usecs: 4012.000, spare = 6654.000
> load = 37.3161 max usecs: 4077.000, spare = 6589.000
> load = 38.3140 max usecs: 4193.000, spare = 6473.000
> load = 38.1988 max usecs: 4062.000, spare = 6604.000
> load = 37.9818 max usecs: 4028.000, spare = 6638.000
> DiskStream Vocals:0: playback underrun (called with 512 samples but only
> 0 available; other half: 0) [speed=1]
> load = 47.0099 max usecs: 5977.000, spare = 4689.000
> transport command: STOP
> transport Stopped
Reported in mantis as id 0000280:
>>> Another, possibly unrelated, dilemma is an issue I have been
>>> encountering when running latencies (with or without automation) at
>>> or below 3 ms latency (i.e., p=256, n=2 @ 48KHz sampling rate) when
>>> running a 2.4 kernel. In this case, the ardour log window displays a
>>> bizarre error message saying something about a MIDI memory pool error
>>> and to please compile with larger size. When I run a 2.6 kernel,
>>> this error does not seem to occur.
>> i am sorry to say that this is a long standing problem that we have
>> never tracked down. i hope we can solve it before the release of 1.0.
>> please make sure its registered with mantis (ardour.org/mantis)
> No problem, I can do that . . .
Reported in mantis as id 0000281:
>>> sessions), however, the disk stream errors persist whenever
>>> automation is enabled and my system latency is set any lower than
>>> 11ms (p=1024,n=2 at 48KHz).
>>> My current workaround is to run the gentoo development kernel
>>> 2.6.3-r1, and use low latencies as low as 3 ms for recording or
>>> non-automated mixdowns, and a setting of 11ms latency or greater if I
>>> am mixing down with automnation.
>> how many tracks are you using? a PIII-450 is not a particularly speed
>> machine, and it *is* possible that automation is bogging you
>> down. however, the problems you mentioned above are not related to
>> automation in any direct sense.
> Although my hdsp can handle up to 24 channels of ADAT I only am
> currently using a maximum of 8. Most of the mixes I have so far have
> between 5 and 7 tracks. IF you take a look at the spare time jackd is
> reporting in the extract pasted above, there seems to be enough headroom
> in the CPU for the work I am doing. What is interesting is the fact
> that automation in one of the earlier betas (either ardour-0.9_beta9 or
> ardour-0.9_beta10) seemed to work without these issues.
> Thanks again for all the fine work you and the ardour development team
> are doing.
> - David
David R. Bergstein
Systems Engineer and Blues Musician -
Heart of Blue - bookings on-line at http://www.heartofblue.com
OpenPGP Public Key 0xE1F138CA - For info see http://www.gnupg.org
Key fingerprint = C86E CA2A 4171 AC73 91D7 3DCE 8832 D764 E1F1 38CA
More information about the Ardour-Users