[ardour-users] Latency Trouble
jesse at essej.net
Wed Apr 7 14:16:29 PDT 2004
philicorda wrote on Wed, 07-Apr-2004:
> 512 frames at 96k=5.3ms latency
> 128 frames at 96k=1.3ms latency
> 1.3ms is kinda pushing it. :) You could try xfce4 as a desktop, it's
> quite lightweight compared to KDE. It also has a lot of features that
> are lacking in a very minimal desktop like fluxbox/blackbox.
Note that you've quoted the latency in one direction only, not round-trip
latency that is important for software monitoring.... so the effective
latency is actually double those numbers.
More information about the Ardour-Users