[Ardour-Dev] translators!

[Alexandre Prokoudine]

Paul,

Thanks, I confirm the fix. Now it's only mixed tracks that need
ngettext love, the rest seems OK :)

Alexandre

On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com> wrote:
> after a lot of wrangling with waf, this should now be fixed. i checked ru.po
> and the plural forms appear to be there.
>
> svn update will cause a complete rebuild, because waf has changed.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:21 AM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> the problem is that intltool needs to be told about P_() ....fixing that
>>
>> %d only works if the code uses printf() and friends to format the message.
>> we are using C++ and the type-safe "compose" mechanism, which uses %1. it
>> won't be a problem.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 3:07 AM, Alexandre Prokoudine
>> <alexandre.prokoudine at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> Here's a quick overview of plural forms issues that still exist.
>>>
>>> First of all, ngettext suggests to use %d instead of %1. P_() macros
>>> doesn't work with %d. In fact, it doesn't even work with %1. Here are
>>> some examples:
>>>
>>> From sfdb_ui.cc:
>>>
>>>                 string_compose(P_("found %1 match", "found %1 matches",
>>> matches), matches));
>>>
>>> This never gets merged into PO files. Nor the other occurence of same
>>> phrase later in the file.
>>>
>>> From ardour_ui.cc:
>>>
>>> if (tracks.size() != how_many) {
>>>                                 error << string_compose (P_("could not
>>> create new audio track",
>>> "could not create %1 new audio tracks", how_many), how_many)
>>>                                       << endmsg;
>>> }
>>>
>>> Two issues in the example above:
>>>
>>> 1. As already discussed on IRC, in Russian this won't work for numbers
>>> like 21, 41, 71 etc. There should always be a variable. I can submit
>>> English translation that deals with it to make the actual user visible
>>> phrase in English look more natural, i.e. the way it is now.
>>>
>>> 2. Again, the combination of the P_() macros and the %1 variable
>>> doesn't work. Neither PO files get ngettextized, nor the actual
>>> phrases are put into PO files as is. After running ./waf i18n I get
>>> the "could not create %1 new audio tracks" phrase placed to the bottom
>>> of the PO file and marked as obsolete. Apparently gettext thinks that
>>> phrases inside P_() don't exist.
>>>
>>> When you think you fixed it, you can check if it worked by running
>>> ./waf i18n and checking if the entry looks like this:
>>>
>>> #: ardour_ui.cc:1388
>>> #, fuzzy
>>> msgid "could not create %d new audio track"
>>> msgid_plural "could not create %d new audio tracks"
>>> msgstr[0] "first plural form translation"
>>> msgstr[1] "second plural form translation"
>>> msgstr[2] "third plural form translation"
>>>
>>> That's for Russian with its three plural forms.
>>>
>>> The other problem is that  "could not create a new mixed track"/"could
>>> not create %1 new mixed tracks" is not ngettextized in the source
>>> code. I tried fixing it by rewriting the code, but I'm obviously
>>> lacking required programming skills.
>>>
>>> Alexandre
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Paul Davis <paul at linuxaudiosystems.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > should be improved and/or fixed in svn now. P_() is a new plural form
>>> > i18n
>>> > macro.
>>
>>
>



-- 
Alexandre Prokoudine
http://libregraphicsworld.org