[ardour-dev] code monkeys
paul at linuxaudiosystems.com
Fri Jan 7 18:57:52 PST 2005
>I'm more concerned about session file compatibility over the
>transition from 1.0 to 2.0. Taking this other thread about ?'s in file
I thought I had made this clear enough, but apparently not.
2.0 will feature NO FUNCTIONAL CHANGES TO ARDOUR.
The only purpose of the 1.0 -> 2.0 transition is to facilitate a port
to GTK2, which will involve a fairly massive change to the gtk_ardour
Post-1.0, we guarantee that your 1.0 and later sessions will *always*
load or alternatively there will be a conversion utility.
>I'm thinking that none of the developers are using VFAT or maybe this
>? question would have been seen by now. I haven't updated Ardour and
It was added within the last two weeks or so.
More information about the Ardour-Dev